Skip to content
AirfryerHQ

Choosing an air fryer

Which specifications change how a machine cooks, which are marketing, and what the number on the box actually measures. Written to help you decide, not to sell you anything.

There is no “best air fryer” on this site and there is not going to be one. AirfryerHQ has not used any of these appliances, takes no advertising and earns nothing on any link. A ranking needs a judgement about which machine is better and that needs having cooked with them, which we have not. What we have read is the manuals — so this section explains the specifications rather than scoring the products.

Start here: what the numbers mean

Four things change how a machine cooks. Most of the rest is comparison-table filler, and the most important figure is not printed on any box.

Which shape of machine?

The biggest decision, and it is about how you cook rather than about quality. A drawer, two drawers, one flexible space or a cavity with shelves are different appliances that share a name.

All the architectures in detail

Running cost, with the evidence

There is now measured data behind this rather than only arithmetic — and it says the saving is real, and that a good part of it comes from the machine being smaller.

Before you commit

Two questions that decide how long the appliance lasts, and almost nobody asks either before buying.

The machines we hold manuals for

AirfryerHQ has read the manual for 29 models. 29 of those pages carry enough model-specific detail to be worth landing on; the rest are published, linked and honest about holding little. None of them is a review.

Browse by manufacturer if you know what you own or what you are looking at.

Compare them side by side

Why there is no size selector here

A tool that told you which capacity suits your household would need to know how much food each machine holds in a single layer. That figure is published by no manufacturer in this catalogue, and it cannot be derived from litres or from external dimensions without inventing it.

So the tool does not exist, and the gap is recorded rather than filled with a plausible-looking answer. If that changes — if manufacturers start publishing base dimensions, or somebody measures them — it becomes possible, and this is the first page that will say so.